CFP: Changing the Subject: Poesis, Praxis, and Theoria in the Humanities (grad) (2/1/06; EGSO, 4/22/06-4/23/06)
Call for Panels and Papers: Deadline 2/1/06
The English Graduate Student Organization (EGSO) of the University at Albany, SUNY announces its annual graduate student conference Saturday April 22 and Sunday 23, 2006:
Changing the Subject: Poesis, Praxis, and Theoria in the Humanities
Robert Scholes is the Keynote Speaker, presenting a paper titled "Changing the Subject: Periodical Studies"
Robert Scholes is Andrew W. Mellon Professor of Humanities and Emeritus Professor Emeritus of English, Comparative literature, and MCM at Brown University. He served as the 2004 President of the MLA and is currently Director of Modernist Journals Project. Without doubt, those of us in English studies have encountered at least one text by Robert Scholes. Many times The Rise and Fall of English is a text we confront as we negotiate our place in the academy. However, in our preparation as teachers, Textual Studies approaches issues about literary theory's place in the classroom, in terms of the theoretical and pragmatic. For our course work as scholars, we see his engagement of critical theory and critical practice in several books, such as Semiotics and Interpretation and Structuralism in Literature. In addition, Modernist scholars look to his work on the period via In Search of James Joyce and will be looking forward to the publication of Paradoxy of Modernism in 2006.
Changing the Subject: Poiesis, Praxis, and Theoria in the Humanities
For more than two thousand years, Aristotle's division of rational human activity into Labor, Action, and Contemplation has served to guide discussion about our work as writers, teachers, and scholars. The model has also been invoked recently to help maintain divisions and identities among the disciplines that make up the humanities. In the past century, Aristotle's model has been, like many cultural assumptions, held up to increasing scrutiny. Martin Heidegger, Hannah Arendt, and Paolo Virno are only a few of the thinkers who have reconceived the boundaries among these categories, while movements as diverse as psychoanalysis, surrealism, and deconstruction have questioned the very foundation upon which these categories stand. The separations among the disciplines have undergone a similar challenge and reconfiguration. Writers such as Robert Scholes, Stanley Fish, bell hooks, Paulo Friere, John Guillory, and Bill Readings have examined the shifting ground of the humanities!
only re-imagining the topic of our study but also our reconceptualizing who we are as human subjects.
Perhaps these changes should not surprise us; for does not the impulse for the crossing of boundaries, for conversation rather than compartmentalization, lie at the very heart of literature? That is, has not literature always already had a tradition of crossing lines, and has not this quality served as a definition for the literary? Have not those boundaries, whether abstract, generic, or national, been at the subject of works ranging from Aphra Behn's Oroonoko to the more recent by poet John Ashbery, and the novels of W.G. Sebald and J.M. Coetzee? And, furthermore, has not literature and the teaching of literature always had as its focus not merely the representation of our identity but very literally our conceiving of it?
What relevance, then, does the classical model have for us today? And what, if anything, might replace it? Possible topics on this theme include performance and criticism of boundary-crossing art, studies of the effect of mass-production and global economies on the work of art, discussions of the politics of teaching and the future of the university, and questions about the role of theory in today's increasingly cross-disciplinary study.
Panels and papers are sought for three general and flexible areas: Pedagogy/writing instruction, Creative Writing, and Literary/Critical/Philosophical. Please email a 300-500 word panel proposal or abstract with a short biography to egsoalbany_at_yahoo.com.
"Avoid the world, it's just a lot of dust and drag and means nothing in the end."
From the Literary Calls for Papers Mailing List
Full Information at
or write Jennifer Higginbotham: higginbj_at_english.upenn.edu
Received on Sun Nov 27 2005 - 18:23:04 EST