full name / name of organization:
â€œNationally liberated zonesâ€, â€œviolence against foreignersâ€, â€œradicalisation of youthâ€: Right-wing
radicalism has been drawing a great deal of attention from the media, civil society protagonists,
and social scientists. A dramatic increase in incidences of violence against perceived minorities
and of youthful votes for right-wing parties in East Germany has included debate on the possible
causes, which range from the masculinisation of the East, to the inherent attraction of right-wing
parties, to the disenchantment of East Germans with the â€œsystemâ€ â€“ and not least, to the
normalcy of right-wing perspectives within larger spheres of the local population, notably,
concerning the discursive production of â€œthe otherâ€.
This â€œmoral panicâ€ is occurring at the same time as the importance of the state is said to be
waning â€“ due to decreased social spending, international changes in sovereignty, the weakened
bonds of citizenship, and so on: it is thus said to become less effective in tackling endemic social
problems. Nevertheless, as the state still claims the sole legitimate use of force, phenomena like
â€œnationally liberated zonesâ€ â€“ also called â€œno-go areas for visible minoritiesâ€ â€“ produce a
fundamental problem that state authorities must tackle. In prevention programmes, approaches
against right-wing cultures vary and so do outcomes: it seems as if in some cases anti-racist
training serves to intensify participantsâ€™ racist attitudes.
We would like to initiate a discussion concerning the perception of right-wing radicalism in the
discourses of state protagonists and in mass-media discourse.
The conference â€œThe State and â€œthe Others: Reacting to Xenophobiaâ€ will try to serve as a
condensation of the discussions and research results on these topics, particularly within the
European context. The focus here is
1.) on constructions of â€œthe otherâ€ in recruitment areas for right-wing parties on the one hand,
2.) on the possibilities of changing right-wing attitudes through state (or state-sponsored)
institutions in a comparative perspective.
We want to compare and discuss different ways of dealing with radicalism in EU countries,
different premises under which this problem can be seen and the sort of subject formation that
is connected with the different approaches. We assume that strategies of preventing racism
should imply an analysis of the construction of â€œthe otherâ€ in the corresponding discourse to be
Please send your abstract of 700 words while specifying which (if any) of the following streams
you are addressing:
Stream 1: State Policies: What concepts exist on how, and why, right-wing movements are to be
prevented? What is problematised and how is it solved?
Stream 2: Prevention programmes: What training programmes against right-wing youth cultures
exist, how are they implemented, what conceptions of â€œright-wingâ€ and â€œthe otherâ€ are used?
Stream 3: Right-wing cultures: What concepts of â€œthe foreignâ€/â€the otherâ€ prevail, how do these
legitimise marginalisation, what is being problematised?
Contributors are invited to prepare a presentation of 25 min, which will be followed by a
discussion period of another 20 minutes. The conference will take place in Leipzig on March
11-13, 2008. Please address your abstracts by October 22, 2007 to
Dept. of Political Science
From the Literary Calls for Papers Mailing List
more information at
Received on Tue Sep 25 2007 - 09:24:28 EDT