CFP: [Religion] The Religious Turn in Late Medieval and Early Modern Studies

full name / name of organization: 
Andrew Bozio
contact email: 
bozio@umich.edu

Call for Papers

The Religious Turn in Late Medieval and Early Modern Studies
A Two-Day Conference held by the Early Modern Colloquium
The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
February 6-7, 2009

Keynote Speakers: Sarah Beckwith (Duke University) and Arthur Marotti
(Wayne State University)

The Early Modern Colloquium, a graduate interdisciplinary group at the
University of Michigan, is requesting submissions for its conference on the
religious turn in late medieval and early modern studies, to be held
February 6-7, 2009.

Most broadly conceived, this two-day conference is about religion in the
late medieval and early modern periods and our contemporary critical
relationship to it. Not only do we intend this conference to deal with
religion around the time of the Reformation – both the tensions governing
religious practice and the manifestation of those tensions in literature,
art, music, and culture – but we also hope to address methodologies for
interpreting religion within and beyond historical paradigms.

Current historiography suggests a multiplicity of religions existing in
late medieval and early modern Europe, in place of a binary between
Catholicism and Protestantism. This multiplicity includes, but is not
limited to, Lollardy, mysticism, martyrology, female hagiography,
particular religious formations within monasteries and convents, the
Counter-Reformation, and the Puritan movement. Papers are sought which
address the implications of this view of late medieval and early modern
religion or which respond to any of the following questions:

In what ways does this multiplicity of religious practices revise our
former assumption of a Catholic medieval period and a Protestant
Reformation/Renaissance? To what extent does a theory of a split subject,
one who belongs to multiple religious communities at once, complicate our
critical understanding of religion?
How do we as critics respond to religion? In the wake of New Historicism,
what critical or theoretical models can be used for interpreting religion
in the late medieval and early modern periods? Is there, for example, a
performativity of religious experience? Do practices such as typological
readings of drama, devotional meditation, and mystical experience
constitute such a performativity? What are the implications of theorizing
religion as performative, rather than as a kind of ritual or as an
expression of a private belief?

This conference is sponsored by the Departments of English, History, and
Romance Languages & Literatures at the University of Michigan. We therefore
welcome submissions from these disciplines and a wide range of others,
including art history, musicology, theater history, religious studies,
philosophy, and anthropology. Priority will be given to graduate students.

200-250 word proposals should be sent to Andrew Bozio (bozio_at_umich.edu) by
December 15, 2008.

===================================
 From the Literary Calls for Papers Mailing List
            cfp_at_english.upenn.edu
             more information at
         http://cfp.english.upenn.edu
===================================
Received on Mon Nov 10 2008 - 23:45:03 EST

cfp categories: 
religion