search the archive
search the archive categoriesadministration |
Narrative practices and Anglo-saxon documentary film-making: from propaganda to dissentfull name / name of organization: La Revue LISA/LISA e-journal contact email: Delphine.Letort@univ-lemans.fr; gr.fournier@wanadoo.fr Narrative practices and Anglo-saxon documentary film-making: from propaganda to dissent From the expository documentary pioneered by John Grierson in 1926 to the interactive and reflexive genre that Michael Moore’s films emblematically illustrate, the history of the documentary is one of ever-changing cinematographic forms. In his seminal book on the topic (Representing Reality, Bloomington and Indiana, Indiana University Press, 1971), Bill Nichols splits these filmic productions into four categories (expository, observational, interactive and reflexive) which nevertheless seem to interweave to spawn a new hybrid genre mirroring the reality it investigates. These variations correspond to different challenges: they are suited to the reality that is recorded and also to the message that the filmmaker wants to get across. Whether the topic is political commitment, a collection of memories, didactic essays or a social investigation, the documentary never stops revisiting its narrative structures to rewrite History or conjure up counter-versions of historic events. Because of the political strength that mimetic illusion endows the documentary with, this genre can further propaganda (The New Deal) and political dissent alike (conspiracy theories). - Documentary and censorship: when historic truth comes up against vital national interests Proposals should not exceed 500 words, should include a short bibliography and should be sent both to Delphine Letort (Delphine.Letort@univ-lemans.fr) and to Georges Fournier (gr.fournier@wanadoo.fr) by 1st December 2010. cfp categories: cultural_studies_and_historical_approaches film_and_television interdisciplinary journals_and_collections_of_essays popular_culture twentieth_century_and_beyond
|