search the archive
search the archive
[UPDATE] Media in Transition 8: public media, private media CFP deadline is March 1 (conference: May 3-5 at MIT)
full name / name of organization:
MIT Comparative Media Studies / MIT Communications Forum
Media in Transition 8: public media, private media
Conference dates: May 3-5, 2013 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Featured Speakers Include:
Roderick Coover, Dept. of Film and Media Studies, Temple University
Henry Jenkins, Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, USC
Jose van Dijck, Dept. of Media Studies, University of Amsterdam
CALL FOR PAPERS
The distinction between public and private – where the line is drawn and how it is sometimes inverted, the ways that it is embraced or contested – says much about a culture. Media have been used to enable, define and police the shifting line between the two, so it is not surprising that the history of media change to some extent maps the history of these domains.
Media in Transition 8 takes up the question of the shifting nature of the public and private at a moment of unparalleled connectivity, enabling new notions of the socially mediated public and unequalled levels of data extraction thanks to the quiet demands of our Kindles, iPhones, televisions and computers. While this forces us to think in new ways
Reality television and confessional journalism have done much to invert the relations between private and public. But the borders have long been malleable. Historically, we know that camera-armed Kodakers and telephone party lines threatened the status quo of the private; that the media were complicit in keeping from the public FDR’s disability and the foibles of the ruling elite; and that paparazzi and celebrities are strategically intertwined in the game of publicity. How have the various media played these roles (and represented them), and how is the issue changing at a moment when most of our mediated transactions leave data traces that not only redefine the borders of the private, but that serve as commodities
The public, too, is a contested space. Edmund Burke’s late 18th century invocation of the fourth estate linked information flow and political order, anticipating aspects of Habermas’s public sphere. From this perspective, trends such as a siege on public service broadcasting, a press in decline, and media fragmentation on the rise, all ring alarm bells. Yet WikiLeaks and innovative civic uses of media suggest a sharp countertrend. What are the fault lines in this struggle? How have they been represented in media texts, enacted through participants and given form in media policy? And what are we to make of the fate of a public culture in a world whose media representations are increasingly on-demand, personalized and
Finally, MiT8 is also concerned with the private-public rift that appears most frequently in struggles over intellectual property (IP). Ever-longer terms of IP protection combined with a shift from media artifacts (like paper books) to services (like e-journals) threaten long-standing practices
Possible topics include:
Submit an Abstract and Short Bio
Include a Short Bibliography
Proposals for Full Panels
Submit a Full Paper
If you have any questions about the eighth Media in Transition conference, please contact Brad Seawell at email@example.com.