search the archive
search the archive
[UPDATE - DATE CHANGE] Sex in the Margins, Oct. 10-12
full name / name of organization:
Sex in the Margins, University of California, Davis
A conference about commentaries and the histories of sexuality and gender.
Just as commentary is hospitable to both mainstream and esoteric hermeneutic practices, so commentary can host, and disseminate, views that are both utterly conventional and radical. We propose a conference to explore this aspect of commentary, and in particular the intersection of interpretive traditions and the histories of sexuality and gender. We therefore solicit proposals for talks that will focus on commentary as a particular and perhaps even privileged space for discussions of sexuality and gender. We hope to receive abstracts addressing a linguistically, geographically, and temporally broad range of commentaries so that the resulting conference will contribute to a broader appreciation of the ways the histories of reception, sexuality and gender are mutually imbricated in numerous contexts.
Commentary, speaking very generally, is a mode that arises when a culture prizes (for a variety of reasons) texts of an earlier cultural formation and must explicate them to contemporaries. In the case of the western tradition of commentary on “classical” (i.e., pre-Christian Greek and Latin) texts, works that had high status for certain sectors of the society confronted readers and scholars with sexual practices and attitudes that were foreign, in some cases repugnant to later expectations about sexual roles and acts. What makes the commentary – whether marginal, interlinear, or lemmatic – a special instance within reception is that by its very logic it must confront the ipsissima verba of the original author (or at times establish what that verba might have been). In this regard, it is most similar to translation. Of course, commentary can duck the challenge, just as a translation can omit offensive passages, but this is itself worth noting. The expectation, however, that the commentator will do his/her duty to explicate a text creates a library of productive negotiations that merit study. Some may adopt a censorious tone, offering “moral” in addition to philological instruction. How do the two interact? How does prejudice impact scholarship and when does philological rigor trump prejudice? In other instances, specifics in the classical text may offer a scholar of a later period an opportunity to speak about nefanda, license in other words to examine and discuss topics that would otherwise be taboo. In such cases, one might see the space of the margin (whether literal or figurative) as liberatory. Moreover, commentaries themselves have their own reception histories whose contribution to the histories of sexuality and gender have hardly been addressed.
The conference we envisage, it need hardly be said, will not be exhaustive, but we are certainly hoping that it will present a broad set of examples in the commentary traditions of many different Greco-Roman authors, with commentaries in Greek, Latin or vernaculars, and from any period. Studies of commentary on legal texts would certainly be welcome. We are also eager to learn about similar (or very different) negotiations within the commentary traditions in Hebrew, Arabic, Sanskrit, Japanese, Chinese, etc. While “commentary” seems to imply that we are dealing with verbal media, by no means must papers be restricted to “literary” texts.
The conference will take place at the University of California, Davis on October 10-12, 2014. Interested parties should send an abstract of approximately 250 words along with a short CV to email@example.com by April 15, 2014. Although we will not be able to cover expenses for all conference attendees, we invite scholars whose participation would be contingent on a subvention to include a brief description of likely travel expenses and probable financial support. Some limited grants may be available.