search the archive
search the archive
UPDATE: The Art of the Real (9/30/06; Film & History, 11/8/06-11/12/06)
full name / name of organization:
Call for Papers
AREA: Art of the Real
When is a film no longer art but merely a recording, an audio-visual document? It is tempting to evade the question by claiming that, because every document is the product of choices, conscious or not, those choices must amount to some form of art, be it individual or cultural. But aesthetic questions revolve around the quality and kind of choices, not the mere fact of them. When do we say that one documentary--a war film, a reality TV program, a cinematic exposÃ© on drug dealers in City Hall--is aesthetically superior to another documentary? Can we compare documentaries apart from their topics? Ever since Aristotle, literary critics do more than measure the scandal quotient or assess the politics of a text. Topicality runs shallow. What formal and/or thematic components make a documentary artful, not just true or false? If the documentary is a unique art form, like the lyric poem or the tragic drama, then its generic boundaries can be violated. A putatively document
Formal analyses of fictional documentaries or historical fictions
Send your proposal (200-400 words) to Dr. Loren PQ Baybrook, Area Chair, Department of English, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI 54901. Phone: 920-424-2253. E-mail: baybrook_at_uwosh.edu. Panel proposals, for up to four presenters, are also welcome, but each presenter must submit his or her own paper proposal.
This Area, comprising multiple panels, is a part of the Film and History Leagueâ€™s â€œThe Documentary Traditionâ€ conference for 2006. See the Film & History web site (www.filmandhistory.org) for details about the upcoming meetings and about other areas of scholarship.
Loren PQ Baybrook, Ph.D.