Humans have long believed we are distinct from other animals in our rationality, self-consciousness, and use of language. Why, then, do writers, artists, and even scientists so often use anthropomorphism to interpret the behaviors of animals, plants, and even nonliving things such as trains, teapots, and toys? What are the repercussions of this tendency to understand the world in terms of human social and cultural identities?

Volume 55 of Children’s Literature (2027) seeks contributions to a forum that will explore the impact of anthropomorphism, from the positives of inculcating biophilia in young audiences to the negatives of speciesism, racism, sexism, and other harmful prejudices. Interdisciplinary theorizing about patterns across children’s literature will be welcome—from picture books through middle grade and young adult—as will new close readings of widely read texts and storylines in popular culture.

Manuscripts received between now and July 1, 2026, will be considered for inclusion.

Direct questions to Lisa Rowe Fraustino, Editor, fraustinol@hollins.edu. Please send completed essays by e-mail attachment in Microsoft Word to child.lit@hollins.edu.